The Blacklist Refugees

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



5/03/2018 7:58 am  #81


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

Keep in mind that Red said to Jennifer, you want to know why your father abandoned you. Third person.

It's another one of those strange TBL things.


"I could tell you how to win a marathon, but you're assuming it's a 26.2 mile race. It's not. It's a 6.2 mile race that begins at mile 20." Raymond Reddington
 

5/03/2018 8:42 am  #82


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

Honey West wrote:

I thought Red seemed genuinely sad to see Naomi's headstone. I think he was telling the truth to Jennifer as far as what he told her. But it was only the tip of the iceberg and he didn’t tell her everything, nothing more than she needed to hear. As usual. I think we always figured the Cabal was involved. And probably the rest of the Map of Doom. But wow, we haven't heard the Cabal even mentioned for a long time.

Good Blacklister storyline, sort of L. Ron Hubbard meets Stephen King. Between that and the Red backstory stuff, I wouldn’t have expected anything less from A story by Bokenkamp and Reiter.

They’ve really left us up in the air re Samar's fate. Could go either way. I hope she makes it. That’s all we would need - yet another avenging angel FBI agent in the room.

I worry about Reds decision to fly off to Costa Rica, or anywhere for that matter, with his concussion and brain bleed. Good thing he’s taking the doctor with him - that might come in handy when he has a cerebral hemorrhage at 30,000 feet.

 

I did not see Samar in any of the promo photos of the last episode....


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

5/03/2018 9:07 am  #83


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

I know, EC, it’s like the curse of the Cartwright women.

Well maybe Samar’s disappearance will delay Reds flight long enough that he won’t need brain surgery after all.


“I am exactly who I am. And I can assure you, I’m a far more interesting Raymond Reddington than Raymond Reddington ever was."
 

5/03/2018 10:00 am  #84


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

I don't think Naomi/Carla is dead at all. I found that all just a bit too convenient. Maybe it's a ruse and she's alive and well under yet another name. When Red set her and Frank up with a new life, I can't imagine that it wouldn't have involved a new identity, but maybe I'm mistaken. And once again, Red misses nothing, so if Naomi had died (she was murdered, no less, so it would have made the news somewhere!), I find it hard to believe he wouldn't have known about it.

 

5/03/2018 10:08 am  #85


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

CindyKC - Although I don't know if Naomi is really dead, I do know Red in not infallible. The date on Naomi's  tombstone was 2017. If it happened during the time Red was under siege from Kaplan, I could see how he would have missed it.

 

5/03/2018 10:09 am  #86


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

Tatiana wrote:

Keep in mind that Red said to Jennifer, you want to know why your father abandoned you. Third person.

It's another one of those strange TBL things.

The dialog between Red and Jennifer, like the example you gave, does keep the Mommy theory and other imposter theories alive.
 

 

5/03/2018 10:20 am  #87


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

Tuxie400 wrote:

The dialog between Red and Jennifer, like the example you gave, does keep the Mommy theory and other imposter theories alive.
 

We're thinking alike, again. I'm starting to wonder if the "real" RR is Jennifer's father and the imposter is Liz's real father but the real RR is not her father.

I forgot who wrote it (sorry! my netbook won't let me scroll back), but I agree that the actress who played Carla/N. not wanting to return changed the writer's plans sounds like what happened. They needed to re-do the story arc on the fly, again. If they bring Carla/N. back, she will have had plastic surgery, but I can see where maybe they've dropped this idea, and that why the pieces aren't fitting together that well.

I could be wrong.

As a writer, I feel like there's an episode missing, one where we get a few more details about Garvey and the importance of Jennifer. It just seemed like she was set up to be more important than she has turned out to be, but maybe she plays an important part in the season finale.

 

Last edited by IowaWatcher (5/03/2018 10:21 am)

 

5/03/2018 11:08 am  #88


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

Whoo-hoo-hoo, look who knows so much. It just so happens that your friend Naomi here is only MOSTLY dead. There's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead. Mostly dead is a slightly alive Carla.

 

5/03/2018 11:34 am  #89


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

RedIsMyCoPilot wrote:

Whoo-hoo-hoo, look who knows so much. It just so happens that your friend Naomi here is only MOSTLY dead. There's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead. Mostly dead is a slightly alive Carla.



 


"I could tell you how to win a marathon, but you're assuming it's a 26.2 mile race. It's not. It's a 6.2 mile race that begins at mile 20." Raymond Reddington
 

5/03/2018 11:37 am  #90


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

IowaWatcher wrote:

Tuxie400 wrote:

The dialog between Red and Jennifer, like the example you gave, does keep the Mommy theory and other imposter theories alive.
 

As a writer, I feel like there's an episode missing, one where we get a few more details about Garvey and the importance of Jennifer. It just seemed like she was set up to be more important than she has turned out to be, but maybe she plays an important part in the season finale.

 

Same. Could it be that there is a whole year missing? The newspaper Red hides under his foot is dated 2019 not present day 2018. 

I'm telling you, time warps, parallel universes, time travel... 
 


"I could tell you how to win a marathon, but you're assuming it's a 26.2 mile race. It's not. It's a 6.2 mile race that begins at mile 20." Raymond Reddington
 

5/03/2018 11:41 am  #91


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

I just find it too hard to believe that Red would not have been notified of Carla/Naomi's passing through his connections. Just doesn't seem possible, but then I think he did lose so much after Kaplan wrecked havoc on his empire, so maybe no one cared enough to tell him. I just feel like he would have had some eyes given he was setting Naomi and Frank up with safety.  And even more unbelievable is Frank locating Jennifer to deliver the news about her mother. If she really is gone, my gut is that it was triggered by Kaplan and the bones since Tom also died in 2017. 

Writers made sure Red didn't full take on the daddy role.  "Your Father".  Always keep us questioning ourselves.

Liz and Ressler getting to work together again was a nice nod back to season 1. Blacklister was creepy, but I liked the story and was funny call on The Village and how effective brainwashing can really be. That little girls mom will need more therapy than the girl! She was going to watch her daughter burn!!!! My heart was breaking! 

Poor sweet Aram!!!! He just wants his woman back!!! Don't you break his heart writers! I think Red will be ready and willing to help with finding Samar. I sometimes forget she was put on the task force by him. I always wished they would have done more insider stuff together and hopefully we get to see a glimpse of their relationship over the next 2 episodes while she's in extreme danger. 

 

5/03/2018 12:37 pm  #92


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

Tatiana wrote:

Could it be that there is a whole year missing? 

You might be onto something here. We know that Liz has been out of it for many months.

 

 

5/03/2018 1:32 pm  #93


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

Tuxie400 wrote:

CindyKC - Although I don't know if Naomi is really dead, I do know Red in not infallible. The date on Naomi's  tombstone was 2017. If it happened during the time Red was under siege from Kaplan, I could see how he would have missed it.

True. Red is not infallible. But I still say that's a very important part of Red's life/past for him to not have been made aware of somehow. Red found her before, so it's entirely possible she was "killed off" so he wouldn't find her again. Seems eerily similar to Kaplan "killing" Liz to fool Red. Do you recall an exact date on the tombstone or just 2017? I ask only because I've been reading all the discussions about time jumps and so forth, but assuming we are in real time right now (2018) and Liz was in her coma for 10 months, then Naomi would have died sometime AFTER Kaplan was busy destroying Red. He sure had much of his empire and wealth rebuilt over those 10 months.

Last edited by CindyKC (5/03/2018 1:33 pm)

 

5/03/2018 2:51 pm  #94


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

CindyKC wrote:

Tuxie400 wrote:

CindyKC - Although I don't know if Naomi is really dead, I do know Red in not infallible. The date on Naomi's  tombstone was 2017. If it happened during the time Red was under siege from Kaplan, I could see how he would have missed it.

True. Red is not infallible. But I still say that's a very important part of Red's life/past for him to not have been made aware of somehow. Red found her before, so it's entirely possible she was "killed off" so he wouldn't find her again. Seems eerily similar to Kaplan "killing" Liz to fool Red. Do you recall an exact date on the tombstone or just 2017? I ask only because I've been reading all the discussions about time jumps and so forth, but assuming we are in real time right now (2018) and Liz was in her coma for 10 months, then Naomi would have died sometime AFTER Kaplan was busy destroying Red. He sure had much of his empire and wealth rebuilt over those 10 months.

The month on the tombstone was covered up by snow.

 

5/03/2018 2:52 pm  #95


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

Little late to the party, but I must say this is probably one of my favourite episodes of this season yet. The writers finally seem to be willing to answer a lot of questions and wrap up many loose ends for the next (final?) season and the Cabal might make its return. One thing I noted about this episode is that the blacklister is somewhat similar to the Beekeeper from the Blacklist novels who also convinced his community that the people outside form a great danger. 

What I got from the conversation between Red and Jennifer is another confirmation that Red might not really be Red, mainly from referring to her father in the third person. I also think that Katarina was the one person that both the CIA and KGB were looking for, as Red does not confirm Jennifer's question whether it was him. It seems to me that this is not the last we've seen from Jennifer, although I'm curious to her role. 

I'm wondering what the kidnapping of Samar will mean for the plot as well. I like the way the next episode will continue on this episode's short arc. The highlight of this episode must have been Amir Arison's performance. Though Aram has always been a great character, he really stood out in this episode.

 

5/03/2018 5:40 pm  #96


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

I just started a re-watch and I can confirm the newspaper Red covered with his foot so Liz could not see it had a date of May 2, 2019.

Lara and Tuxie - dog themes... Tuxie, I know you mentioned the bobble-head dog in the bad man's laundry van, but I just looked up the book our creepy cult leader was reading, Bowser the Hound, 1920. Love this summary:

=14pxOld Man Coyote craftily leads Bowser the hound away from home, and Bowser gets lost. Will Bowser find his way back to Farmer Brown's? Will Reddy Fox finally catch himself a chicken, now that Bowser is no longer guarding the henhouse? 

https://librivox.org/bowser-the-hound-by-thornton-w-burgess/


"I could tell you how to win a marathon, but you're assuming it's a 26.2 mile race. It's not. It's a 6.2 mile race that begins at mile 20." Raymond Reddington
 

5/03/2018 5:48 pm  #97


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

I just posted on the other thread. I don't think they can keep themselves straight....

Last edited by Eastcoast (5/03/2018 5:48 pm)


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

5/03/2018 10:51 pm  #98


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

I was looking at the stone with Naomi Hyland on it.  I personally thought it looked old. The writing is an older style and it used et, wife et mother.  That is something you see on older stones. Strange....


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

5/04/2018 1:31 am  #99


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

Okay, just for kicks here are the words on the Scrabble game.
Data, train, blurs, lipo, hex, gow, ba, hog, ham, or, oar, smash, stave, van, feti
gow has a blank at the end so could be gown.

Probably mean nothing, but ...

And the name on the prescription bottle is <something>eth Baker. I’m guessing Kenneth.

Last edited by Honey West (5/04/2018 1:35 am)


“I am exactly who I am. And I can assure you, I’m a far more interesting Raymond Reddington than Raymond Reddington ever was."
 

5/04/2018 10:22 am  #100


Re: 5.20- Nicholas T. Moore- Discussion Page

Honeywest, thank you for that!!    I was going to look at that later on to see if there was anything to it.


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum