The Blacklist Refugees

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



3/04/2018 3:37 pm  #1


1989-1990

Hey guys, you know I don't have the greatest memory, but what do we know about the year from fire night to the night Red disappeared? Just point me in the right direction. Do we know anything at all? I still had it in my mind that they happened at the same time even though I know they didn't. I've looked at the timelines several times. What has been speculated?


"I could tell you how to win a marathon, but you're assuming it's a 26.2 mile race. It's not. It's a 6.2 mile race that begins at mile 20." Raymond Reddington
 

3/04/2018 4:11 pm  #2


Re: 1989-1990

Tatiana - I looked at this myself the other day. The only thing I know of is KR walking into the ocean about 2 months after the fire and red confirmed it was 1990. The gap to dec 1990 after that is approx 10 months - the same time as Liz spent in the coma.

Does anyone remember whether the newspaper article inRequiem had a date?  I know I looked for that but done remember. If there was it must have been consistent with that timeline or I think I would have remembered.

 

3/04/2018 4:32 pm  #3


Re: 1989-1990

Lara - thanks a bunch. I just hear a deafening roar of silence for that time frame. You would even think there would have been something in his record if he was still in counterintelligence. Or even if he wasn't be cause we hear nothing up until Christmas Eve 1990. 


"I could tell you how to win a marathon, but you're assuming it's a 26.2 mile race. It's not. It's a 6.2 mile race that begins at mile 20." Raymond Reddington
     Thread Starter
 

3/04/2018 5:09 pm  #4


Re: 1989-1990

lara1 - I think the 10 months is significant, with Liz's coma time being a parallel to it. The time gap has always puzzled me. Tessabltheorist thinks the Christmas Eve is for the Russian Orthodox Christmas, which would have been in January and there is no time gap. But I think if it were the Russian Orthodox Christmas, the January date would have been in the FBI record.

Based on what Cooper said about Seaduke, It seems Raymond Reddington was kind of out there on his own shadowing spies and sending reports back to the Counterintelligence Task Force. It wasn't like he was going back to a Navy ship and would be missed. Could someone else have been masquerading as him and sending back intel? We've never been given information on exactly where his assignment was at that time. There are still so many questions left unanswered.

 

3/04/2018 6:39 pm  #5


Re: 1989-1990

We only ever had Katarina’s word that the KGB learned of her affair and she was only speculating that the US intelligence knew as well, correct?  I don’t recall anyone bringing it up before Kirk and it is only ever mentioned in the journal and by KR to Kate in Requiem.  What if no one actually knew at the time,  at least not on the US side?  What if Red was able to hide it until he disappeared? The only person to really allude to anything before Kirk was the Director.  He told Red that he knew who Red was to Liz.  While vague, “who you are to her” implies a relationship of some sort.

Last edited by Brittany (3/04/2018 6:47 pm)

 

3/04/2018 7:37 pm  #6


Re: 1989-1990

Brittany - Requiem is the only place I know that we hear the KGB had heard about her affair with Reddington. And she was speculating that U.S. Intelligence would soon know too. The Director seemed to know Katarina because of the comment he made to Liz about her looking like her mother, and of course he knew of Reddington too. So I don't know if that's because information about the affair became known to U.S. intelligence, or because Red was using Katarina as a double spy. In her diary, she writes about talking to the "Agency"  but not telling them the truth. At the time, I thought Agency probably referred to the CIA, since the Russian spies report to "The Center."

 

3/05/2018 12:00 am  #7


Re: 1989-1990

Tuxie400 - interesting about Orthodox Christmas, but I tend to doubt that's the case.  Not only does Ressler refer to just "Christmas Eve", national television broadcasts did also when reporting on Red's "capture" in Braxton; Americans generally understand Christmas Eve to be Dec 24, the eve of the US national holiday so anything other than Dec 24 would have been specified, eg January whatever.  IN any event, I don't see how that solves what happened to Red in 1990 - whether its Christmas in Dec 1989 or Jan 1990, we still have nothing for him for the entire year of 1990.  Of course nothing in TBL land is impossible.  

In Red's story to Maddie he mentions oyster stew, which is an American thing for Christmas Eve.  Of course that story could have been entirely fabricated.  I don't happen to think its fabricated entirely, just some details made up.  But there is nothing to say its true.

 

3/05/2018 12:46 am  #8


Re: 1989-1990

I have read that theory and I agree it could solve a time issue but I agree with lara1 brought up about this. It was the first thing that came to my mind as I was reading it. But who knows? 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/05/2018 12:55 am  #9


Re: 1989-1990

lara1 wrote:

Tatiana - I looked at this myself the other day. The only thing I know of is KR walking into the ocean about 2 months after the fire and red confirmed it was 1990. The gap to dec 1990 after that is approx 10 months - the same time as Liz spent in the coma.

Does anyone remember whether the newspaper article inRequiem had a date? I know I looked for that but done remember. If there was it must have been consistent with that timeline or I think I would have remembered.

​It did not show the date on the paper that I could tell, but the dates of the cars were from 2001-2005 or 06.  I think someone said they made a mistake with the paper. 
​So could that have really been on purpose so we did not have a actual date to go by? 
 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/05/2018 1:01 am  #10


Re: 1989-1990

Tuxie, it is odd that she said that the Agency wanted answers and she lied to them and only to Raymond was she truthful.  I am not saying she didn't love him, But She told Kate that she was never going to end up with Raymond. 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/05/2018 1:55 am  #11


Re: 1989-1990

I was just looking at the timeline and 1990 was a busy year. 
​Liz is kidnapped. 
​There is a fire where Liz is at and KR brings her to the hotel to Kate.  
KR walks into the ocean.
Red disappears. 
​Naomi and her daughter are put into protective custody.  
​The picture of Berlins daughter is taken.  
Dom says he came to the us and changed his name.  


 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/05/2018 7:03 am  #12


Re: 1989-1990

I also do not believe in the Orthodox Christmas situation.  Because the overwhelming majority of Americans (and even federal holiday) consider Christmas December 25th which would make Christmas Eve the 24th.  The FBI would have specifically said “January” if it were orthodox Christmas because they can’t risk the mistake of being off by nearly a year.

 

3/05/2018 7:41 am  #13


Re: 1989-1990

I think we can say the orthodox Christmas can be debunked.

Here's two things that pop out to me:

1. The trigger for Red's disappearance is not fire night, but increasing pressure and threats culminating in the death of one of his associates by the stewmaker December 1990.

2. Can we suppose that Liz lived with Red at explosion house until 1988, then she was taken away by Katarina. How to explain growth chart up until 3 years old?


"I could tell you how to win a marathon, but you're assuming it's a 26.2 mile race. It's not. It's a 6.2 mile race that begins at mile 20." Raymond Reddington
     Thread Starter
 

3/05/2018 7:54 am  #14


Re: 1989-1990

Tatiana- I was never sure if the growth chart at the Tacoma Park house was supposed to be from Liz or Jennifer.  And seeing as that was so early in the series,  I wonder how much (if any) relevance it has now. After Kaplan’s role was expanded to be Liz’s nanny. I don’t know how it could have been Liz.   Kaplan didn’t appear to know about Red until Liz was 2 or 3 (I’m not sure how old she was in that scene) so she wasn’t accompanying them to that house.  It’s possible Katarina would take her there on her own and give Kaplan some time off or whatever.

 

3/05/2018 10:09 am  #15


Re: 1989-1990

Yes - I forgot to add, the Stewmaker photo of Berlin's daughter dated Dec 1990.  AS I recall, the place of that photo in the book was out of order, I can't remember exactly what it was, but we commented on it at the time. My idea on it (which others may have too, I have no idea), was that the photo was dated and inserted where it was very purposefully.  As in, the actual Stewmaker thing took place after Dec 1990 but was dated Dec 1990 as a warning to Red, especially when a copy was left for him as a warning.  

 So to me, something happened in Dec 1990 that caused Red to disappear - whether or not he came home to find his family taken or killed.

 

3/05/2018 10:12 am  #16


Re: 1989-1990

I think the growth chart at Takoma Park house relates to bubble girl.  But who is bubble girl?

And what was the significance of having Elise in Season 4 have so many similarities to bubble girl - the way she looked, the way she dressed, that scene where she flies over the couch in ARam's apartment with hair flying and arms extended, was like bubble girl running with hair flying and arms extended.  Not to mention that Elise flooded Aram's apt with suds from the washing machine.

That made me think more that Liz is not bubble girl.  Or, it could have been symbolic.  Of what, I don't know.  They also had Emma appear very reminiscent of ballet girl, even down to her black and white clothing, clueing to white swan/black swan of Swan Lake.

All very strange.  Unless it was pointing to Kaplan and the ultimate demise of Red's empire, but it doesn't make sense to me.  Maybe the attic in Tansi Farms has the answer and we weren't shown that yet.
 

 

3/05/2018 10:20 am  #17


Re: 1989-1990

The thing I don't get about how Liz lived "on and off" at Kirk's house - unless that is another lexical ambiguity - is that we never see Kate and Liz except at the house.  KR employed Kate precisely because KR's "work" meant she was away a lot, traveling.  She did not (that we were shown) take Liz with her.  Kirk was also away a lot.  So until Masha was kidnapped by Reddington, she seemed to stay at Summer Palace and "the campus" (whatever that was).

So I can't make Takoma Park fit into the KR/Liz timeline.  I can't see how it was fire house either, from the news report we were shown, the fire was in "downtown" and showed something more like more modern townhouses, not detached Victorian homes.  So, if the room they pass in the fire memories was Liz's room (I happen to think it was another girl's room, but that's my thing, LOL), how was she living in Takoma Park?
Then again, Liz's memories were messed with, so maybe even that was changed?   although based on what we saw the Dr. do, he inserts actions by people superimposed over existing places.  LOL  that fire memory could mean anything.  

 

3/05/2018 10:34 am  #18


Re: 1989-1990

Lara - well, that's interesting about the Stewmaker victim, I thought she was misplaced in his 'photo album' but I thought the photo was dated correctly but placed too early in the book. I'll have to look.

I agree, I think there were two girls as well. And I think your observation that the girls look so different, confirm it, although, let's face it, TBL takes great artistic license with character portrayals: eg, our dog Hudson (was that his name?). LOL!

I have a lot of time on my hands so I'm going back and watching some episodes again to see if anything stands out to me differently.


"I could tell you how to win a marathon, but you're assuming it's a 26.2 mile race. It's not. It's a 6.2 mile race that begins at mile 20." Raymond Reddington
     Thread Starter
 

3/05/2018 10:40 am  #19


Re: 1989-1990

Tatiana, re the stew maker photo, I think the discussion was on the old board.  I can't remember if the real date of when Berlin's daughter went to the Stewmaker was derived from the Kursk bombing dates and figuring out from what Red and Berlin said, or if it was just placed out of order in the album - because the Stewmaker was meticulous in his chronicling of the photos.  I think there are freeze frames out there somewhere that show the dates of the photos surrounding the photo of berlin's daughter, like the Dec 1990 date on the photo was out of order with the others.  So much to remember!  LOL

 

3/05/2018 10:42 am  #20


Re: 1989-1990

Eastcoast wrote:

I was just looking at the timeline and 1990 was a busy year. 
​Liz is kidnapped. 
​There is a fire where Liz is at and KR brings her to the hotel to Kate.  
 

Aren't the kidnapping and the fire in 1989? Or were you just trying to say that list of stuff seems to have happened in a one-year time frame? 


 

Last edited by Tuxie400 (3/05/2018 10:49 am)

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum