The Blacklist Refugees

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



3/09/2018 12:31 am  #21


Re: 5.16

lara1 wrote:

Eastcoast -  ooh I find that very intriguing.  Because I always thought as a child she witnessed something while in that closet.  Which is why her memory was changed, to not remember it and thereby help protect her.  But he could be talking about anything.

thanks for posting the photos.  I have it all figured out.  Garvey is the real Reddington.  LOL

 

​I am so glad I am between bites lara!  I was wondering if he knows the relationship they have?  

It would be a hoot to think it was him though....lol

 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/09/2018 12:32 am  #22


Re: 5.16

Tuxie,  It is one thing and then another with blackmail. Red is going to do him in!!  I think this is where the doubles might come in??


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/09/2018 12:34 am  #23


Re: 5.16

you know I was thinking about Garvey saying to Red, you don't know who I am do you?  It reminded me of - what was that woman, Isabella Stone?  Who Red put in the freezer to make her talk?  She started off by saying, you don't know who I am, or you don't recognize me, or something like that.  But Red knew exactly who she was.  I wonder if its the same with Garvey - ie Red knows exactly who he is.  I guess we will find out next week......

 

3/09/2018 12:39 am  #24


Re: 5.16

Your right about that comparison!  Maybe you should add that to your list after it airs? 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/09/2018 12:41 am  #25


Re: 5.16

He might be playing the game just to see what all he can find out.  I will say he does look a bit baffled, but he is good at playing dumb, lol


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/09/2018 12:48 am  #26


Re: 5.16

Eastcoast - You do have a point. If he was there on fire night, he may be talking about something she witnessed as a child.  Or it may just be the Tom kill.

     Thread Starter
 

3/09/2018 12:51 am  #27


Re: 5.16

The thing is, I've been thinking that the real RR might have been a truly bad man - a lot like Garvey. Wouldn't it be really wild if Garvey was the real RR? I think we're all up way too late tonight.

Last edited by Tuxie400 (3/10/2018 10:26 pm)

     Thread Starter
 

3/09/2018 12:52 am  #28


Re: 5.16

Yes, and I think that is what the writers want us to wonder. I think they know we have talked about that ring and they wasn't us guessing! like we don't have enough already, lol


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/09/2018 12:53 am  #29


Re: 5.16

I know!  When I read that wile ago I lol again and hoped I didn't wake anyone up!! 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/09/2018 12:54 am  #30


Re: 5.16

Actually Tuxie, JB did say RR was a Bad man. 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/09/2018 10:53 am  #31


Re: 5.16

Tuxie400 wrote:

The thing is, I've been thinking that the real RR might have been a truly bad man - a lot like Garvey. Wouldn't it be really wild if Garvey was the real RR? I think we're all up way to late tonight.

LOL Tuxie400 I didn't see this and wrote the same thing on another thread last night!  It would be really wild.  Real RR maybe left to die but escaped something like that.  Or even, just RR whatever the circumstances.  

 

3/09/2018 4:00 pm  #32


Re: 5.16

Maybe RR is the Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader character of TBL?


“I am exactly who I am. And I can assure you, I’m a far more interesting Raymond Reddington than Raymond Reddington ever was."
 

3/10/2018 1:38 am  #33


Re: 5.16

lara1 wrote:

Tuxie400 wrote:

The thing is, I've been thinking that the real RR might have been a truly bad man - a lot like Garvey. Wouldn't it be really wild if Garvey was the real RR? I think we're all up way to late tonight.

LOL Tuxie400 I didn't see this and wrote the same thing on another thread last night!  It would be really wild.  Real RR maybe left to die but escaped something like that.  Or even, just RR whatever the circumstances.  

​I am glad you said that. I went through scanning the comments and then when I came back to answer this one I thought it looked different?  I also thought I must be more tired than I thought! lol 
 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/10/2018 1:40 am  #34


Re: 5.16

Honey West wrote:

Maybe RR is the Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader character of TBL?

 

​I was joking to myself about that when he was talking to the computer kid about Star Wars.  I think we can link almost anything to TBL. 
 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/10/2018 9:48 pm  #35


Re: 5.16

Questions I hope are answered in this episode:
1) Why Garvey wants the 'truth'?  that was a new thing we saw from the Canadian promo.  
1a) Does Garvey actually know the truth?  He has the results of the CODIS search, but does it still leave him with questions? 
2) How did Garvey link the suitcase bones to Red?  Did Pete tell him they were connected to Reddington somehow or did he figure out his own way?   The only thing Pete told Tom was that he didn't say who else knew about the CODIS search (such as Tom and Nik).  Not that he hadn't said anything about the connection to Reddington. 
3) How is Dom (as Oleander) connected to all of this?  How (and what) did Kaplan know about him?

I've been wondering if we as the viewers will get the answer to the bones before Liz does?  They did earlier in the season with revealing the suitcase to us before it was even given to Tom.  And that the cliffhanger at the end of the season will either be tied to her response to the secret or something else arises as a result of the secret. 

 

3/10/2018 10:07 pm  #36


Re: 5.16

I have a seedling of a theory about Dom. Maybe after next episode I can flesh it out.


"I could tell you how to win a marathon, but you're assuming it's a 26.2 mile race. It's not. It's a 6.2 mile race that begins at mile 20." Raymond Reddington
 

3/10/2018 10:28 pm  #37


Re: 5.16

Brittany - I don't think Pete ever knew Reddington was involved with the bones. Tom told Nik, but I don't think either of them told Pete. In Tom's two meetings with Pete, Reddington's name was never mentioned. Pete was just told the bones needed to be identified.

     Thread Starter
 

3/11/2018 1:36 am  #38


Re: 5.16

Tatiana wrote:

I have a seedling of a theory about Dom. Maybe after next episode I can flesh it out.

​Can we get a hint?  Teaser! lol


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/11/2018 1:38 am  #39


Re: 5.16

I do not remember Pete being told about him either. Lena and Pete both seamed clueless when Garvey was asking them questions. 


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

3/11/2018 7:45 am  #40


Re: 5.16

I couldn't remember if Pete had been exposed to Reddington's name or not. 

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum