The Blacklist Refugees

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



10/12/2017 9:15 pm  #41


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

lara1 - I agree that the case was to keep Liz busy while Red was pulling his con to get the guns and plane. I was kind of surprised Tom agreed to be part of it.  Perhaps he thought that con would be going too far for Liz, or thought she might get hurt if it went sideways.

Brittany - I totally missed Red's comment about wanting to be locked up with a redhead. I wasn't even going to rewatch this episode, but I may because of that. And, of course, I would not mind seeing the scenes with Glen again.

Last edited by Tuxie400 (11/24/2018 12:00 pm)

 

10/12/2017 10:43 pm  #42


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

I finally got to watch this episode this evening. So nice that Red has a nice new plane, I always love Glen!

So, what did Red get out of this Blacklister? Nothing readily apparent. It could be that he had her arrested for some future plan, or it could have been simply to prove the viability of the Task Force to their superiors. Red needs the Task Force. For what they provide to help him and also they are important to Liz. Like Red told Tom, you are important to Elizabeth, therefore you are important to me. Same probably goes for the Task Force.

I guess the guns were part of Red's business loose ends. I'm sure he has other deals left hanging that will come back to bite him. any of these could be the next Big Bad. Sorry we won't be back to Terrace Vista. Oh well, we knew it couldn't last and they had pretty much used it up.

Smokey would use elephants. With his circus connections it was probably easier to get elephants than bulldozers. Plus it was just fun.

My current thinking about Bones is that we will get an ID pretty soon. But knowing who it is won't solve anything as far as their importance to the Mystery of Raymond Reddington. We still won't know how or why whatever happened to the person, I think whatever we learn it will just lead to a hundred new questions and even larger mysteries. Sort of like the paternity issue hasn't solved anything either. And just what does Tom know about Red? We've long suspected that he knows way more than he lets on. But then again, maybe he's just guessing a lot of it with no solid proof.

Anyway, just some quick thoughts. I'll need to watch it again.

Just wanted to add, Red knows Ressler had something to do,with Hitchins' death and that he's now in deep doodoo. His offer to help is sincere. Made me think of
Anslo  Garrick where he saved Ressler.

Last edited by Honey West (10/12/2017 10:52 pm)


“I am exactly who I am. And I can assure you, I’m a far more interesting Raymond Reddington than Raymond Reddington ever was."
 

10/12/2017 10:54 pm  #43


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

lara1 wrote:

Big Badd Bazzer wrote:

Sidenote: Just watched my PVR copy of Bull: Blacklist Edition, featuring ex-Blacklister Susan Blommaert and Deirdre Lovejoy (Texas accent lady) in prominent roles. Susan is a remarkably versatile actor - and I'm glad to report tomorrow is her 70th birthday. She played the judge on Bull - hopefully she'll repeat the role. Deirdre played the grieving mother of a college frat boy who died during hazing rituals - normally a sluff-off role but in a cruel twist she kinda stole the show at the end. The kid who fessed up to the crime (1 of 15 frat boys charged) is a remarkable actor. Kinda reminded me of a new age James Dean - if that's even possible. Good episode - Bull's team had little or nothing to do. It was almost all Bull (Mike Weatherley) and the guest cast.

BBB - glad you liked the episode.  the funny thing is, I normally don't watch Bull, nor much network TV actually,but I decided to watch it Tues.  The performances were all extraordinary.  Plus that wonderful TBL alumni surprise!  
 

One other alumni note. Tawny Cypress showed up on the last ep of NCIS: New Orleans. . . . . playing a mirror image of series regular Vanessa Ferlito - both gals noted for being mean girls on the show. Tawny started off as a no-nonsense FBI pro - but rapidly degenerated into "Heel of the Week". She did good as a female foil to Ferlito's excellent portrayal of Tammy Gregario


Red: I can only lead you to the truth. I can’t make you believe it
 

10/13/2017 12:23 am  #44


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

I also thought this was to keep Liz busy.  Kind of an odd episode but very telling.

Red has No doubt caught wind that Ressler is in some trouble.  I've been expecting that one I was just wondering how many episodes it was going to take to bring it out.

If there was any doubt he was on to Tom there isn't now.
Tom should not have said anything about knowing he thinks Red lies to Liz!  Now that he has a little $$ I think he will be keeping more tabs on Tom.

It wouldn't be so bad if there were just a few smart remarks between the new crew, but it is a bit too much for me.

I must add, as soon as I saw the man in the tight suit get the phone call i knew she was going to kill him. I thought what a dummy running your mouth in such a bad position... ( no pun intended )

My favorite part of the episode was what I found so telling at the end. Red has been very humbled. He has remembered what its like to really need a helping hand.
That was not possible without Glenn and he knew it. 

Last edited by Eastcoast (10/13/2017 12:24 am)


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

10/13/2017 8:48 am  #45


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

Eastcoast- I agree with you that Red has been humbled by everything.  His initial reaction to Glen is to want to kick him out, but then he realizes that Glen seems to genuinely care about him and he would likely be dead if it weren't for Glen, so he gives him that pat on the back, which was so terrific.  Red mentioned his own arrogance back in Cape May while talking to himself/hallucination Katarina, and he is arrogant because he is very good at what he does.  But I do think he has realized again that his arrogance got in his way and that will perhaps shape him moving forward. 

I also think this episode shows that Red is genuinely broke (in the liquid asset sense).  He has conversations with Dembe and Hawkins about the fact that he has no liquid assets (or not enough to do more than survive) so I think that takes away some of the suspicion that he isn't as broke as he appears.  He clearly still has business since he offers Hawkins and Smokey a percentage of it to work for him, though not nearly what he once did.  He probably has some physical assets overseas, but he has no plane to get to them and he can't fly commercial.  I wonder if Dembe can even fly commercial.  He may not be on the most wanted list, but I can't believe he has just totally flown under the radar while standing by Red's side all these years. 

 

10/13/2017 8:56 am  #46


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

Honey West wrote:

I
My current thinking about Bones is that we will get an ID pretty soon. But knowing who it is won't solve anything as far as their importance to the Mystery of Raymond Reddington. We still won't know how or why whatever happened to the person, I think whatever we learn it will just lead to a hundred new questions and even larger mysteries. Sort of like the paternity issue hasn't solved anything either. And just what does Tom know about Red? We've long suspected that he knows way more than he lets on. But then again, maybe he's just guessing a lot of it with no solid proof.

I agree, Honey West.  Like JB has said in a million interviews, the paternity question may be answered, but all it does it open up more questions.  The question has never really been who he is, but why did he need to come into Elizabeth's life.  I think the identity of the bones will do the same thing until Liz actually learns about the whole ordeal and is able to confront Red about it.  Because I think whatever information she will ultimately get would force Red to tell her the truth.  And while I do not worship at the altar of the "Red doesn't lie to Liz" gods, I do believe he tries to be as truthful with her as he can be while protecting his own interests (including his relationship with her) and believing he is protecting her safety and happiness. 

 

 

10/13/2017 9:20 am  #47


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

Wait til Dembe tries to register Red's new Jet. Even the DMV won't be of help on that one!!!

Anyways, a bit of directorial and continuity ignorance never hurt a good show, did it?


Red: I can only lead you to the truth. I can’t make you believe it
 

10/13/2017 10:24 am  #48


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

My guess is what someone (somewhere?) suggested: That the bones will be ID'd to belong to a child and the writers hope the audience will gasp and frantically wonder "who is the child?!?" and/or "did Red murder a child?!?" when it's really just the bones of an exhumed random child, used to fake Masha/Liz's death when the heat was on decades ago.

I haven't thoroughly thought that through yet. Like one of you recently said, i don't want to make myself too crazy over theorizing. I'll let the story play out and enjoy the ride.

One would immediately point out that Dr Nik would have taken one glance and immediately said to Tom "this is a child's skeleton" and perhaps he did say that but that was conveniently not shown to the audience until the writers are ready for us to know that. Or perhaps it is plainly obvious to Tom that it is a child's bones so there's no need for him and Dr Nik to say that but again, WE haven't been shown the same up close view they have seen.

We'll see. That's my current guess/hunch. My other guess of course is that the bones are Katarina's. (though I am also very open-minded to the Redarina theory). My thoughts have never been on the possibility of "another child/sibling" because thus far I really haven't seen much convincing evidence hinting towards that. For me that would come out of left field. But shocking twists are always fun.

Last edited by JackPow (10/13/2017 10:46 am)

 

10/13/2017 11:36 am  #49


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

I keep coming back to what I still find puzzling - the bones were meant to show Liz "the truth" of why Red came into her life; yet JB says Kate did not factor in the paternity reveal - I still can't figure out what that means, or whether Kate ever knew Red was the father (if he was heh heh).  

     Thread Starter
 

10/13/2017 11:47 am  #50


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

JackPow #48 - here is some food for thought, why I think there may be a second child.  I'm not totally convinced there is/was but its interesting to think about:

1.  flora segunda - the plot concerns a child whose older sister had died, and the surviving sister was given that sist'er's name (and expected to an extent to "be" like the older sister)
2.  The little girls in that one scene behind the louvers in the fire memories - the second child's image is a fade, almost a ghostly image, like she is yet isn't there (its not Liz who is shown separately - there are 3 images in that closet scene -  (it was crowded, LOL)
3.  The Summer Palace - seems to be there were two of many things, though that of course can be otherwise explained.  And the doll house that looked a lot like Takoma Park house (same basic structure and color).  also, I think in one of the photos on the mantel in Liz's room, there were two children with KR
4.  Kirk's comment that unlike Red, he would not hurt his daughter (whatever that meant)
5.  the fight in the fire memory where the father calls her "elizabeth" and the mother, "Masha".  Interesting that up to that point, we have never heard Liz being called Elizabeth - KR, Kirk and Kaplan (all those Ks, LOL) all call her Masha.  So how/why is she then called Elizabeth in fire house.  that is never explained, I don't think. Even in KR's "diary" she talks about Raymond wanting her to leave with Masha.  I don't know I just think its odd.
6.  Lord Baltimore - twins, one had died.

Then of course there's the technique of having two "girls" talk int he closet - big Liz and little Liz, and that there are scenes where the hair length differs (though that could have been because scenes were filmed a few months apart)

Not saying any of this proves anything and each can probably be explained some other way.  But I think its interesting!

Last edited by lara1 (10/13/2017 11:53 am)

     Thread Starter
 

10/14/2017 8:21 pm  #51


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

I've still never seen the whole 'two girls in the fire' thing.  That just confuses me to no end.  But as for the Elizabeth/Masha name difference, it made more sense to me after Requiem when we learn that Red took Liz from KR and apparently went on to start the renaming process with Elizabeth, which would be why he was calling her Elizabeth and KR would call her Masha.  And then in the season 4 deleted scenes Sam talks about how she's going by Elizabeth at that point (which was after KR told Kaplan she wasn't coming back and before she is seen in the newspaper, so 2 months(ish) after the fire).  That makes me think Red talked to Sam sometime in those first two months, especially since Kaplan didn't seem to know about her name being changed to Elizabeth. 

Last edited by Brittany (10/14/2017 8:22 pm)

 

10/15/2017 12:12 am  #52


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

Brittany, we have a discussion on fire night.  I have posted another pic of the girl in the closet because I see I must have deleted the other one because the link wasn't working.


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

10/15/2017 12:15 am  #53


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

I agree with what you say in post 51. But someone seams to have been on there? ?


It's a shame you have no crackers  
 

10/16/2017 10:47 am  #54


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

So I had a wild thought and it doesn't belong anywhere in particular so I'll add it here as this thread is till active.

I was thinking about the memory alteration Krirov said was done two years ago.  Suppose it was done before Braxton and so what we see are not the memories that Red had changed/implanted but something else of which Red is not even aware?  Is that why the "flashes" appear?

Its hard to tell real time vs BL time, but Braxton occurs nine episodes prior to Leonard Caul.  so not a huge time gap.  

Still, I tend to think it happened after Leonard Caul and Liz found out something in the apartment.  She was digging through a lot of stuff.  And I'm thinking again that newly implanted memory may have been the shooting of her father, to cover whatever it was that she found out in current day.  Some of us have thought that the "shooting" memory doesn't line up with the "fire" memory, in terms of the people who may have been involved....

Its curious that Red only speaks of Liz's father dying in the fire, etc prior to that.  I still think he seemed surprised/relieved when she said that the "everything" she remembered was that she remembered shooting her father at the end of Connolly.  He was expecting worse.

I now wonder, given the Kaplan storyline, whether Red had that kind of sick/worried look on his face when Liz said she knew "everything" in Connolly because he thought that she had found out then whatever it was that Kaplan was going to tell her with the bones.  But she still didn't know,  so he was relieved.

So I'm thinking more than ever that the suitcase is related to what happened the night of the fire in some way.  and the fire night house clues in that scene with Tom in Dennison't flat point to that.

Last edited by lara1 (10/16/2017 10:54 am)

     Thread Starter
 

10/16/2017 3:10 pm  #55


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

Speaking of the fire, lara1,  I had also been thinking of the timing and Red's apparently fire-related injuries. We figure that he needed recovery and recuperation time. And that he was still running intelligence operations, etc. so how did his bosses deal with him? Was the fire thing a private matter between him and the Russians or was it all part of a US intelligence operation? Did his employer take care of him? Would there be any records from that time that Liz might be able to find? I would think that at the very least she would be actively checking up on him and his actions during those critical years between her birth and his "disappearance" in 1990. At least she might find some official records. Of course, I keep forgetting that she doesn't know about his burn scars, so it might not occur to her that any medical records might exist. I wonder if the more recent memory thing may have also been to remove the knowledge that she gained from the Braxton thing, like that Red admitted to her that he was there the night of the fire. She hasn't pushed him about that lately that I can think of?


“I am exactly who I am. And I can assure you, I’m a far more interesting Raymond Reddington than Raymond Reddington ever was."
 

10/16/2017 10:14 pm  #56


Re: Episode 5.03 - Miss Rebecca Thrall - Discussion Page

HW - its an interesting thought if the reason why Liz's memories were tampered with two years ago was actually because of what she recalled in Braxton.    As an aside, I always wondered why she seemed so fearful and surprised to see her father in the memory, especially since she seemed to recall before that he'd led her out of the fire (or so she thought).  Though I wonder who else would know about the recall and why that person couldn't have her know what she learned about Reddington.  Questions, questions!  

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum